Sarah Jane Adventures Board Game ( Cancelled )

21 Responses to Sarah Jane Adventures Board Game ( Cancelled )

1. Posted by: TraceyFarah November 8th, 2011 Reply

   Hi all, I am a new participant on your forum therefore I think I would do best to present myself. Here goes, I’m 19 years old, a guy, plus I read english in my college. I for sure hope speaking with you guys. Farewell!

   
   

2. Posted by: BOOBOO JR July 3rd, 2011 Reply

   I never realised there was going to be an SJA Board Game, I would have got it (If it had been released). I don’t know why this stuff never caught on.

   
   

   • Posted by: booboo July 3rd, 2011

     It was marketed all wrong, the packing especially the figures and accessories looked like merchandise aimed at girls, most of the shops put them the girls toys section so it never got the full exposure it deserved

     
     

   • Posted by: RORY DOCTOR RIVER POND October 20th, 2011

     i agree

     
     

3. Posted by: DalekThay November 10th, 2010 Reply

   The separation of the Church of England (or Anglican Church) from Rome under Henry VIII, beginning in 1529 and completed in 1536

   straight from wiki and it clearly says it completed in 1529, 24 years before this story is set! How was jane henry the eights ancestor if the Mary who replaced her was henrys daughter

   
   

4. Posted by: DalekThay November 10th, 2010 Reply

   The separation of the Church of England (or Anglican Church) from Rome under Henry VIII, beginning in 1529 and completed in 1536

   straight from wiki and it clearly says it completed in 1529, 24 years before this story is set

   
   

5. Posted by: D0ct0r11 November 10th, 2010 Reply

   Actually, the Reformation ended in the mid-1600s, and Queen Jane is the ancestor of Henry VII, who was the first of the Tudors. Henry VIII (Henry VII’s son) and his children (except Queen Mary, who was Catholic) formed the Anglican religion in England.

   I understand where you’re coming from though, but the comment was said during a time when the Catholic religion wasn’t very interested in the religious welfare of its followers.

   
   

6. Posted by: DalekThay November 10th, 2010 Reply

   btw the reformation in the catholic church ended in the early 1500s and this is set in 1553 so this takes place after the catholic reformation

   
   

7. Posted by: DalekThay November 10th, 2010 Reply

   The Catholic Church was “treacherous” and very unholy

   That was a small minority of catholic leaders, the majority were good people. And I mean you cant go around calling the catholic church unholy and treachorous nowadays! Its unacceptable and sectarian! I And i mainly mean the offence it caused in my country because it is because of views like this and people speaking out loud with them and being sectarian towards catholics that flung northern Ireland into a civil War resulting in the death 4000 people!

   
   

8. Posted by: D0ct0r11 November 10th, 2010 Reply

   * rather than in heaven.

   
   

9. Posted by: D0ct0r11 November 10th, 2010 Reply

   BTW that was me in the last post.
   Some groups who saw how bad the Church was were also formed, like the Jesuits, and they helped to change and make the Church better. Of course, the Catholic Church has changed greatly since then, and I wouldn’t look at it as “treacherous” in these times, although some people have different opinions. Most people (it’d be very silly if you didn’t) would definitely call the pre-Reformation Catholic Church nonreligious; priests weren’t educated and they cared more about items in everyday life rather than in…

   
   

10. Posted by: Anonymous November 10th, 2010 Reply

    DalekThay, the time Rani is in is during the Reformation, which is when the Catholic Church reformed itself. The Catholic Church was “treacherous” and very unholy. Priests and bishops bought positions in the Church, and they gave places in the Church to family members. Bishops even had more than one diocese. This is the time when many new religions were formed, like Protestantism and Calvinism (it became known as Presbyterianism in Scotland).
    CONTINUES IN NEXT POST.

    
    

11. Posted by: DalekThay November 10th, 2010 Reply

    I must say i was rather offended by SJA yesterday heres why, I live in Northern Ireland and Im Catholic and consider myself Irish. I was shocked when I heard Janes’ maid/nurse describe catholics of that time as treachorous. And I have seen my country torn apart by sectarianism and remarks like this, and it disguists me that it was broadcast on a childrens TV Channel, watched by many children who will now see catholics as evil people because of their portrayal in this episode, shame on the BBC and Shame on Russell T.Davies

    
    

12. Posted by: Anonymous November 10th, 2010 Reply

    GREAT GAME!!! JOKING

    
    

13. Posted by: ANDREW November 7th, 2010 Reply

    Man, I would have loved this,
    why can’t the people who make the SJA figures make them again, i mean they have such a big hit now.

    
    

14. Posted by: Sontar 7 June 3rd, 2010 Reply

    You don’t have it. It was never released.

    
    

15. Posted by: mr smith June 3rd, 2010 Reply

    it is not rubbish it is cool very cool i have

    
    

16. Posted by: CelestialAgent December 14th, 2009 Reply

    That looks cool, even though it’s nearly identical to the 9th Doctor one.

    
    

17. Posted by: SJA Fan September 16th, 2009 Reply

    I would have bought one, i think it a real pitty the merchandise for SJA doesn’t appear to have taken of, the figure sets were excellent at the end of the day .

    
    

18. Posted by: nabusan September 15th, 2009 Reply

    What makes you say that, undertaker? It looks ruddy epic!

    
    

19. Posted by: undertaker September 9th, 2009 Reply

    no wonder why it is so rubbish

    
    

• Rss Feed
• Follow us on Twitter
• Follow us on Facebook
• Follow us on Facebook