August 26th, 2010
189 comments
We earn a commission for products purchased through some links in this article.
Two Unannounced Weeping Angel variants
Two new Unannounced Weeping Angel variants
Two more Weeping Angels are now available to buy bringing the total variants from series 5 to five.
These so far unannounced figures comprise of a regenerating Angel with neutral face as seen on the back of the packaging with the strategist Dalek and a regenerated “weathered” Angel.
You can keep track of all figure releases from series 5 in our collectors list Here
Five variants of the Weeping Angels are now available…
Please note: The above images of the 2 unannounced figures were taken buy ourselves. The figure montage is not an official image.
Categorised under: Doctor Who 5" scale figures, News, Retail, Toys
The Doctor Who Site
Facebook
Twitter
Pinterest
Merchandise
Flickr
YouTube
jazzy jay
September 3rd, 2010 - 10:16amwow now there is a angel wave
james.d
September 3rd, 2010 - 8:38amwhat did you do ?
pupbenny
September 2nd, 2010 - 2:08pmBe careful what you order from there! It could be the weathered/rusty angel. Trust me! I recently ordered a dalek drone on there for £8.49! Except when it came (which was about 2 days ago.) it was a dalek strategist! 😯
who crazy!
September 2nd, 2010 - 12:24pmLucky you 😛
Matt
September 2nd, 2010 - 10:20amOrdered the Regenerated Angel from Play.com
instead of what i ordered, i got the Rusty Screaming Angel in the Regenerated Angel packaging.
harry doolan
September 2nd, 2010 - 10:18ami saw the weeping angels at toys r us
who crazy!
September 2nd, 2010 - 8:04amI also saw the normal faced one in toys r us and forbidden planet. I cant believe i didnt buy it and instead i bought peter the winder. Peter the winder is fun though 🙂
kiebo03
September 1st, 2010 - 7:35pmI saw the regenerating angel with normal face in a little toy shop yesterday.
who crazy!
September 1st, 2010 - 7:01pmI might just watch some of your old reviews or mega shorts. I know! Even thought i dont have a camera i can still do a review! On this site! See me on the crash set page for my review of the crash set.
dan23
September 1st, 2010 - 6:57pmi no dont no whats happening if you want have a look at some old one from year or something ago
who crazy!
September 1st, 2010 - 6:19pmOk. Ie got one page on this and one page on your channel 🙂
who crazy!
September 1st, 2010 - 6:11pmWatching it now.
dan23
September 1st, 2010 - 6:08pmjust posting regenerating angel review
who crazy!
September 1st, 2010 - 6:04pmHe introduced all the best enemies: the autons, the master, the sontarans, the rutans, the wirrn.
dr who dude
September 1st, 2010 - 5:07pmWASTE OF TIME! if you ask me
booboo
September 1st, 2010 - 4:44pmone of them yes
pupbenny
September 1st, 2010 - 4:43pmI think I’ll just leave it because I don’t want it to break.
who crazy!
September 1st, 2010 - 4:39pmBooboo do you agree that the best old doctor who writer was robert holmes?
booboo
September 1st, 2010 - 4:38pmOnly if you have some super glue handy
pupbenny
September 1st, 2010 - 4:35pmOk. Oh and one more question. On my new series daleks if the eye stalk dosn’t seem to be moving up and down then shal I try harder or leave it?
pupbenny
September 1st, 2010 - 4:33pmOk. 😕
booboo
September 1st, 2010 - 4:32pmThere are no larger pictures unfortunately
who crazy!
September 1st, 2010 - 4:32pmWell i must of been wrong then. Forget the comment that said id already got half of series 5.
who crazy!
September 1st, 2010 - 4:31pmThe best classic series writer was robert holmes.
pupbenny
September 1st, 2010 - 4:30pmThis ring any bells? 😕
That was from one of your previous comments.
who crazy!
September 1st, 2010 - 4:29pmMoffat writes the best stories for the 2005- series.
who crazy!
September 1st, 2010 - 4:28pmWeeping angels are my favourite enemies anyway 😛
pupbenny
September 1st, 2010 - 4:28pmYeah so do I. And know I’m typing this sentence otherwize it would be a copy of a comment I previously did. Or that’s what it says anyway!
pupbenny
September 1st, 2010 - 4:27pmYeah so do I.
who crazy!
September 1st, 2010 - 4:26pmI cant remember saying that 😕